Prem Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.823 of 2014 (4) dt.06-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.823 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Prem Ranjan S/O Mahendra Mandal Resident Of Village Baikunthpur, P.O Gangapur, P.S- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna.
2. Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna.
3. D.I.G. Of Police, Bhojpur, Range, Arrah.
4. S.P. Bhojpur, At Arrah.
5. Chairman, Central Selection Board ( Constable Selection), Bihar, Patna.
6. Secretary, Central Selection Board ( Constable Selection), Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Hriday Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 06-02-2015 The petitioner has filed the writ application for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to re-measure his chest, as there were some discrepancies in the initial measurement and the time when he reported for final selection and appointment. Since the big variation has been found in the initial measurement and the actual measurement when he was called at Arrah where he was asked to report . The request for remeasurement was done in presence of the Chairman of the Board and proof thereof has been annexed with the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the Central Selection Board.
Even in this measurement, the chest measurement of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.823 of 2014 (4) dt.06-02-2015 petitioner does not match with the minimum requirement. The variation is too much for any kind of concession. If it was a case of no measurement the second time over, the court could have given indulgence to the petitioner, but the re measurement cannot be carried on till it reaches the satisfaction of the petitioner.
The prayer is misplaced when the petitioner has been given opportunity and indulgence twice over by the authorities on this dispute.
The writ application is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) B.Roy/- U