Nabi Rasool Ansari @ Nabi Rasool @ Navin Rasool v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7999 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2015 Thana -BHANGWANPUR HAT District- SIWAN ====================================================== Nabi Rasool Ansari @ Nabi Rasool @ Navin Rasool, son of Mauladin Ansari, resident of Village- Nagwa, Police Station- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S.Case No. 183 of 2015, corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 437 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is cousin father-in-law of the deceased there is general and omnibus allegation and no specific allegation has been alleged against the petitioner and he is in custody for seven months. Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation and petitioner has remained in custody for seven months, let the petitioner, above
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7999 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017 2/2 named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge-IIIrd, Siwan, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 473 of 2016, arising out of Bhagwanpur Hat P.S.Case No. 183 of 2015, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U