Surendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3649 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Surendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Shubh Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Sugia Katesari Jagir, Ward No. 12, P.s. - Sheohar, District- Shoehar. 2.
Anil Kumar Jha, Son of Late Shobhakant Jha, Resident of Village - Sugia Katesari Jagir, P.S. - Sheohar, District- Shoehar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The District Magistrate, Sheohar.
5.
The Civil Surgeon - cum- Chief Medical Officer, Shoehar. 6.
The Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation having its office at Hospital Road, Shastri Nagar, Patna - 800023 through its Managing Director.
7.
The Managing Director, Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation, Hospital Road, Shastri Nagar, Patna - 800023. 8.
The Chief General Manager (Projects), Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation, Hospital Road, Shastri Nagar, Patna - 800023. 9.
The Deputy General Manager (Projects), Bihar Medical Services and Infrastructure Corporation, Hospital Road, Shastri Nagar, Patna - 800023. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Kumar Panday, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.S.D. Yadav (Aag9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) Date : 11-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioners have prayed for following reliefs:-
2/4
3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner will be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and to take recourse to such other alternate remedies which are equally efficacious in law. Prayer allowed.
It stands clarified that all issues of fact and law are left open.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand
4/4 disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 11.03.2022 Transmission Date NA