← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3858/2017bail granted

Md. Salauddin @ Salauddin v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-15Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3858 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3858 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA GRP CASE District- GAYA ====================================================== Md. Salauddin @ Salauddin, Son of Nathuni Ansari, Resident of VillageBhitti, P.S.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur(Bhabhua). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Sasaram Rail (Bhabhua) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2016 registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Regarding theft of three mobile sets and ornaments of informant, Sasaram Rail (Bhabhua) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2016 was instituted on 08.09.2016 against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while it is alleged that in course of investigation, one stolen mobile set was recovered from possession of the petitioner but it would appear that I.M.E.I No. 357642051737276 of mobile set, which is said to be recovered from possession of the petitioner, is different from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3858 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 I.M.E.I. No. 357642051737276 of mobile set as detailed in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 17.10.2016. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rail , Gaya, in connection with Sasaram Rail (Bhabhua) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T