Saurabh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12397 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2024 Thana- ASHTHAWAN District- Nalanda ====================================================== Saurabh Kumar Son of Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Prasad @ Manoj Singh Resident of Village- Mohabbatpur, P.S.- Shekhopursarai, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Man Mohan Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case No. 275 of 2024 dated 12.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 319(2), 318(4), 316(3), 338, 336(3), 340(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66Cand 66D of the I.T. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons were apprehended by police. They disclosed their name as Rajkumar, Sourabh Kumar and Sushant Kumar. On search, four mobile, three ATM cards and one motorcycle were recovered. It is further alleged that four mobile phone were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one mobile phone was also recovered from the possession of the co-accused,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12397 of 2025(2) dt.05-03-2025 2/2 Sushant Kumar. The petitioner and the co-accused persons are involved in Cyber Crime.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case merely on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nalanda in connection with Asthawan P.S. Case No. 275 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T