Dilip Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7804 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Dilip Manjhi, Son of Ashok Manjhi, Resident of village - Makdum Ganj, P.S. Chapra Mufassil, District - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : . Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : . Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S.Case No.03/2017 for the offence under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30, 38, 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case as there is alleged recovery of 7 1⁄2 ltrs. of liquor, he is in custody for about one month and he has clean antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has also not controverted the above facts.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has remained in custody for
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7804 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017 2/2 about one months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S.Case No.3 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U