Satyanarayan Baitha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11675 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2014 Thana- MALI District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Satyanarayan Baitha, Son of Tileshwar Baitha @ Tileshwar Rajak Resident of Village - Bela Khaira, P.S.- Mali, District - Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mali P.S. Case No. 53 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379,34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner and others came on the motorcycle and informant's motorcycle and other articles were snatched by petitioner and one Vijay Paswan. Subsequently, the motorcycle was recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that, though, the petitioner was named in the FIR, but the accusation of snatching of motorcycle is not against the petitioner.

A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11675 of 2019(4) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Mali P.S. Case No. 53 of 2014, subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) khushbu/- U T