Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11859 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2025 Thana- BARHAT District- Jamui ====================================================== Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Yadav Son of Shiv Shankar Yadav R/o Village - Bhaluka, P.S.- Barhat, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate Ms. Aadya Dipti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 109, 324(6), 331(1), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 28.10.2025 at about 05:30 PM his villager Golu took his DJ set for idol immersion on the eve of Chhath Puja and insisted on playing political songs near his house, but the same was objected, as such, the accused persons including the petitioner got angry and thereafter the accused persons entered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11859 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/3 his house and assaulted his mother and sister with deadly weapons, further Mukesh assaulted his brother Sajan by an iron rod causing injury on head, thereafter Krishna assaulted with stick causing injury on hand and Shivshankar assaulted Rampravesh on account of which he fell and Mukesh broke the window of the car and snatched Rs. 2,000/- from his pocket.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and no specific allegation of assault is alleged against him, the petitioner abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11859 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 158 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T