Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16457 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-511 Year-2023 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Rahul Kumar Son of Shivji Prasad Resident of Village- Piparahi, Police Station- Barauli, District- Gopalganj 2.

Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar Son of Rakesh Prasad @ Rakesh Mahto Resident of Village- Piparahi, Police Station- Barauli, District- Gopalganj 3.

Bittu Kumar Son of Fodi Prasad Resident of Village- Piparahi, Police Station- Barauli, District- Gopalganj 4.

Shivji Prasad Son of Late Bunilal Prasad Resident of Village- Piparahi, Police Station- Barauli, District- Gopalganj 5.

Bullet Kumar Son of Fodi Prasad Resident of Village- Piparahi, Police Station- Barauli, District- Gopalganj 6.

Ajit Kumar Son of Rakesh Prasad @ Rakesh Mahto Resident of VillagePiparahi, Police Station- Barauli, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avnish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506 & 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. All the accused persons named in the F.I.R. having with deadly weapons came to the informant and assaulted him and his family members by their respective arms.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16457 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2 such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Both sides have filed cases against each other. The injury sustained by both sides are grievous in nature. Except petitioner nos.1, 4 and 5 other petitioners have criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No.511 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T