← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14252/2025bail granted

Krishna Chaudhary @ Krishna Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-06Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14252 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-679 Year-2024 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Krishna Chaudhary @ Krishna Chaudhari Son of Late Kanhaiya Chaudhary Resident of Village- Madhopur, Malahi Tola, Ward No. 05, P.S.- Majhaulia, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayank Mohan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Majhauliya PS Case No. 679 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 91 litres of country made liquor was recovered from Motorcycle. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that motorcycle in question does not belong to the petitioner. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14252 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/2 is further submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired on secret information. The petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Majhauliya PS Case No. 679 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T