Jeeto Mahto @ Jitendra Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11781 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-489 Year-2022 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

JEETO MAHTO @ JITENDRA MAHTO SON OF LATE BHAGLU MAHTO R/O VILLAGE- GANGA PRASAD BIND TOLI, P.S.- BARAUNI (CHAKIYA), DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI 2.

REENA DEVI @ RUNA DEVI WIFE OF JEETO MAHTO @ JITENDRA MAHTO R/O VILLAGE- GANGA PRASAD BIND TOLI, P.S.- BARAUNI (CHAKIYA), DISTRICT- BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prerna Anand For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners produced a copy of the injury report in the Court. Let the same be accepted and kept on record.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons abused the informant's daughter and quarreled with her. On protest, the petitioners assaulted the informant and also snatched Rs.1900 from his pocket. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11781 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner no.1 is the husband of petitioner no.2. He further submits that both the sides are agnates. The injuries are simple in nature, which is evident from the injury report. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Barauni (Chakiya) P.S. Case No.489 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T