Patna High CourtCWJC/10452/2013dismissed

M/S Green Ray International Ltd. And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-19Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10452 of 2013 ======================================================

1. M/S Green Ray International Limited, A Public Limited Company Having Its Registered Office At Green Ray Multiplex, Deuli Panchghanta, Jaleshwar, Balasore, State- Orissa Represented By Its General Manager, S.K. Nurul Hossain, S/O Sk. Abdul Gani, R/O Village- Takatpur, P.S.- Baripada, District- Mayurbhanj, State- Orissa

2. S.K. Nurul Hossain S/O Sk. Abdul Gani Presently Being The General Manager Of Green Ray International Limited Having Its Residence At R/O Villge- Takatpur, P.S.- Baripada, District- Mayurbhanj, State Orissa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar, Through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Banka, Bihar

3. Senior Deputy Collector (Banking)-Cum-Nodal Officer Banka, Bihar

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Banka, Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashish Giri For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore(Paag.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 19-04-2016 Mr. Ashish Giri for the petitioners and the counsel for the State are present.

On 11.04.2016, this Court on the request of Mr. Ashish Giri, the counsel for the petitioners, passed the following order:- "Mr. Ashish Giri the counsel for the petitioner states that the matter be placed after 07 days so that in the meanwhile he may consult his client as in the recent past he has not received any instruction.

Considering the issue involved and expiry of more than two and a half years, the Court is inclined to accede to the request of the petitioner.

List the matter after 07 days."

Patna High Court CWJC No.10452 of 2013 (6) dt.19-04-2016 2/2 Mr. Giri has fairly conceded that in spite of his best efforts he has not been able to take instruction from his client. In such a situation, he is unable to press this writ application for the present. In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed as not pressed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U