Ganesh Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14267 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1259 Year-2013 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== GANESH JHA, Son of Late Shivdutt Jha, Resident of Village - Naraha, P.S.- Majorganj, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Manoj Thakur @ Chunnu Thakur, Son of Sri Narayan Thakur, Resident of Village - Dhosaut, P.S.- Siwaipatti, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party No.2 in A.B.P. No. 1974 of 2014 vide order dated 18.2.2015 by learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur.

It appears that earlier the complainant has filed such petition before the court of Sessions Judge and the same was rejected on the ground that the complainant is in habit of filing of such petitions. From perusal of Annexure-1 it appears that complainant filed petition in the year 2015 for cancellation of bail granted to accused and the same was dismissed with a direction to the petitioner to produce the witnesses and thereafter again petition has been filed on 27.6.2016 for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14267 of 2019(2) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 cancellation of bail bond of opposite party No.2 and learned Sessions Judge has found no cogent ground for cancellation of bail of opposite party No.2.

Heard both sides and in the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the order granting anticipatory bail to opposite party No.2, rather, as suggested by the court, the petitioner is directed to produce witnesses and learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T