Firoj Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8052 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -199 Year- 2016 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Firoj Ansari, son of Ali Mian, resident of Village- Khirlichiya, P.S.- Raxaul, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Raxaul P.S.Case No. 199 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR and only on the basis of confessional statement he has been made accused and there is no recovery from the petitioner and T.I. Parade has been held and he is in custody for more than five months and other co-accused has been granted bail by this Court in Cr.Misc.No. 54744 of 2016 vide order dated 20.12.2016.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that except confessional statement there is nothing against the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8052 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 2/2 petitioner and he is in custody for five months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Raxaul P.S.Case No. 199 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U