Amrit Soren v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9875 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictMADHEPURA ====================================================== Amrit Soren, son of Bhagwan Soren, resident of village Kothi Tola, Ward No. 09, P.S. Bihariganj, District Madhepura .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Panchanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Complaint Case No. C-94(7) of 2016 lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 30(d) and 37(b) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that it is alleged that from behind the house of the petitioner 60 kg. Jawa was recovered and not from his house and except that there is nothing against him and he is in custody since 24.10.2016. Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that petitioner has been made accused in one more case of similar nature.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that 60 kg. of Jawa was alleged to have been recovered not from the house of the petitioner and he is in custody since 24.10.2016, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9875 of 2017 (2) dt.01-03-2017 2/2 bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-I, Udakishunganj, Madhepura, in connection with Complaint Case No. C-94(7) of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U