Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15250/2017bail granted

Bikki Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15250 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -67 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Bikki Kumar Son of Arjun Uraon Resident of Village- Samrat Chowk Line Basti, P.S. K. Hatt (Sahak), District Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with K.Hatt (Sahayak) P.S.Case No.67 of 2017 for the offence under Sections 272 & 273 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though it is alleged that 30 ltrs. of country-made liquor have been recovered from the house of the petitioner but the falsity of the case will appear from the seizure list, in which nothing has been mentioned that the same has been recovered from the house of the petitioner rather it appears that it has been recovered from the Samrat Chowk Line Basti, P.S. K.Hat (Sahayak) of District- Purnea and the petitioner is in custody for about two months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15250 of 2017 (3) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea in connection with K.Hatt (Sahayak) P.S.Case No.67 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U