Ram Awadh Mushar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1808 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2019 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAM AWADH MUSHAR Son of Late Parikha Mushar Resident of Village - Amawaliya, P.S.- Kargahar, Distt.- Rohtas.
... ... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Ms. Usha Kumari, Spl. P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2021 Let the defects be removed within four weeks after start of the physical Court.
Heard the parties in virtual Court proceeding. This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 07.11.2020/16.01.2021 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Reg. Case No. 192 of 2019 arising out of Kargahar P.S. Case No. 217 of 2019 registered under Sections 302, 34 of the I.P.C., and Section 3(2) (v) of the SC/ST Act.
Dead body of the son of the informant was found and thereafter, two others were suspected to be involved in the murder of son of the informant. Appellant is not named in the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1808 of 2021(2) dt.02-07-2021 2/2 FIR. During investigation, name of the appellant surfaced. Appellant has got no criminal antecedent. Investigation of the case is already complete.
Considering the facts aforesaid, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:
(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.
(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) shahzad/- U T