Mukesh Kumar Dhadhi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7597 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -117 Year- 2014 Thana -SARMERA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Mukesh Kumar Dhadhi son of Balmiki Ram resident of village- Old Isua, P.S.- Sarmera, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ritan Yadav Son of Late Ram Yadav

3. Nitish Kumar Yadav son of Amarjit Yadav

4. Bhumal Yadav @ Bhomal Yadav son of Triloki Yadav all are resident of village- Old Isu, P.s. - Sarmera, District- Nalanda. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat, Spl. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 28-08-2015 The Petitioner seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the Opposite Parties No.2, 3 and 4 by order dated 16.1.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Nalanda vide A.B.P. No.97 of 2015 in connection with Sarmera P.S. case No.117 of 2014.

It has been submitted that the private Opposite Parties were not entitled to anticipatory bail since the provisions of SC & ST Act have been levelled.

I find from the order of the Sessions Judge that he had considered the fact that no ingredients for the offence under the SC & ST Act was available. I see no reason for interference. The application stands dismissed.

Narendra/- (Anjana Prakash, J) U T