Nusrat Jahan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4251 of 2020 ====================================================== Nusrat Jahan, W/o- Md. Muzaffar Hussain, Resident of village - Singhari, Ward No. 5, P.S. Rauta, Block Baisa, District - Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Through its Commissioner cum Secretary Social Welfare Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director ICDS Patna, District- Patna.
3.
The Regional Development Officer, Commissionary office Purnea, DistrictPurnea. 4.
The District Magistrate, Purnea, District - Purnea. 5.
The District Programme officer Purnea, District - Purnea. 6.
The Child development project officer (CDPO) Block - Baisa, District - Purnea.
7.
Ward Member cum Chairman Aam Sabha of Anganwari Sewika Singhari, P.S. Rauta, District- Purnea.
8.
Ward Panch cum deputy chairman Aam Sabha of Anganbari Singhari, P.s. Rauta, District - Purena.
9.
Mahila Supervisor, member cum Secretary Singhari, P.S. - Rauta, DistrictPurnia. 10.
Rukaiya Begum, W/o - Safique Alam, Resident of village - Singhari, Ward No. 5, P.S. Rauta, Block - Baisa, District- Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Ziaul Quamar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. Raisul Haque (SC10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the selection of respondent No.10 as Anganbari Sewika Ward No.05 Gram Panchayat Singhari.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4251 of 2020(2) dt.22-03-2024 2/2
3. Learned counsel for the State raised the preliminary objection that the appointment of Anganbari Sevika has not been challenged before the proper forum.
4. In this background, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.
5. Permission granted.
6. The writ petition is disposed off granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with the law within four weeks.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U