Bhogi Kamat @ Bhogendra Kamat @ Bhogi Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13271 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- KHIRHAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Bhogi Kamat @ Bhogendra Kamat @ Bhogi Kamat Son of Shiv Kamat @ Shibu Kamat Resident of Village- Hisar, P.S.- Khirhar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 109, 351(2), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have assaulted on the head of wife of informant with khanti.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Both parties are neighbours and due to long standing land dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. The present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of five days and there is no plausible explanation for the same which itself makes the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13271 of 2026(3) dt.10-07-2026 2/2 entire prosecution case doubtful. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by this petitioner, simple in nature. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 01.01.2026.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner, clean antecedents of the petitioner and period of custody, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipatti, Madhubani in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T