Sajid Ansari And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7707 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2015 Thana -HUSAINGANJ DistrictSIWAN =====================================

1. Sajid Ansari, Son of Raju Rahman,

2. Matlub Ansari @ Mutalib Ansari, Son of Kodin Ansari,

3. Shamim Ansari @ Kodin Ansari, Son of Md. Noor Ansari,

4. Athar Hussain @ Akhtar @ Atahar Ansari, Son of Ibrahin Ansari.

All resident of Village- Jamal Hata, P.S.- Haussainganj, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anjum Akhter, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy (APP) ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-03-2016 It is stated by learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, that petitioner No.2, namely, Matlub Ansari @ Mutalib Ansari, has been arrested by the police during the pendency of this application, in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No.55 of 2015. This application to the extent it relates to

petitioner No.2 stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Hussainganj P.S. Case No.55 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 337, 427 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, has drawn my attention towards an order, dated 13.08.2015, passed in Cr. Misc. No.32352 of 2015, whereby, similarly circumstanced co-accused persons have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the submission, as above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner Nos.1, 3 and 4, abovenamed, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No.55 of 2015, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the

petitioner Nos.1, 3 and 4 shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Praveen-II/- U T