Sheru @ Sirajuddin @ Sirajuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13456 of 2017 (3) dt.12-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13456 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2015 Thana -CHAKAI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Sheru @ Sirajuddin @ Sirajuddin Ansari Son of Late Razzaque Ansari, Resident of Village-Ramchandi Het, Chakai, Police Station-Chakai, District-Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 08.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 202 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 11.09.2015 having no criminal antecedent and the petitioner is not the assailant. During trial the informant has turned hostile, nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP seriously opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner, tempo driver and one unknown robbed the informant and deceased amounting to Rs. 69,250/- and 73,000/- respectively and one unknown person who was sitting on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13456 of 2017 (3) dt.12-04-2017 the back seat of the tempo shot Jamshed and the petitioner was instigating him and further the tempo driver gave 2-3 blow with danda, resulting Jamshed died on the spot.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T