Pravin Yadav @ Pravin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.732 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2019 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== PRAVIN YADAV @ PRAVIN KUMAR Son of Phocho Yadav @ Sri Devilal Yadav Resident of Village - Sonevarsha, P.S. - Chautham, District - Khagaria. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Usha Kumari 1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 10.01.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, (S.C./S.T. Act), Khagaria, in connection with Chautham Police Station Case No.279 of 2019, registered under Sections 147/148/149/307 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(i)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. There is case and counter case.

Allegation is general and omnibus against seven named and 10-15 unknown persons to have fired at the informant and attempted to kidnap him.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.732 of 2020(2) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 Considering the general and omnibus allegation, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Courtbelow where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. (c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T