Samir Ansari @ Sameer Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12165 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Vaishali ====================================================== SAMIR ANSARI @ SAMEER ANSARI S/O LATE ABDUL KALAM R/o Mohalla - Hidayatpur, P.O.- Mahua, P.s.- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Aayesha Khatoon W/o Samir Ansari R/o Mohalla/Village- Hidayatpur, P.O.- Mahua, P.S.- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajiv Prashant, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-03-2025 Heard Mr. Rajiv Prashant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 31/2023 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3⁄4 of D.P. Act.
3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the complainant/informant who is the wife of the petitioner has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12165 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 2/3 alleged that for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, the petitioner along with his family members had assaulted her.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that mediation between the petitioner and O.P. No.2 before the learned District Court failed as O.P. No.2 refused to co-operate and also denied to live along with the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that due to inadvertence, he has not specifically stated in the bail application that petitioner is still ready to live and keep the opposite party no.2, who is his wife, with full dignity and honour.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Vaishail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 31/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12165 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 3/3 Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T