Shashi Bhushan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11382 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2018 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Sharma, Son of Late Ram Lochan Sharma, R/o villageBhori , P.O- Bhori , P.S- Tekari, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manish Kumar No2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Surendra Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No.345 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
The allegation against the petitioner is to have caused khanti blow upon the informant causing injuries on his back and palm.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the doctor has not found any injury on the back and hand of the injured. The reason behind the occurrence was irrigating the field in which some minor scuffle took place.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11382 of 2019(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VI, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No.345 of 2018 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a further condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T