← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12317/2023allowed

Sabita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-18Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12317 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-704 Year-2021 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== SABITA KUMARI Daughter of Badri Prasad W/O Shiv Shankar Prasad, R/O Village - Bhaluhi, P.S.- Majhauliya, District - West Champaran. Who was Posted at Rajkiya Primary School, Raghunathpur, Gram Panchayat Raj Dumri, P.S.- Majhauliya, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Cabinet, Vigilance Department, Patna, Bihar, Through S.P. Vigilance. Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra :

Mr. Anil Singh :

Mr. Arvind Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the Vigilance. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

Allegation against the petitioner is that she has secured service as Panchayat teacher on the basis of the forged documents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12317 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 case. He further submits that petitioner was a teenager and was with her father who was working at Sindri, the petitioner persuaded her academic studies and he never committed any forgery or any kind of foul play. He further submits that the petitioner has been removed from the service mentioned para-10 of the bail application. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the vigilance opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No.704/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T