Raj Kishore Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2261 of 2012 ====================================================== Raj Kishore Yadav Son of Rameshwar Yadav, Resident of Village - Kaushikapur, P.S. Birpur, District - Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Supaul

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Supaul

4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Birpur, District - Supaul

5. The Block Development Officer, Basantpur, District - Supaul

6. The Circle Officer, Basantpur, District Supaul

7. The Engineer in Chief, Bihar Rajya Pool Nigam , Bihar, Patna

8. The Superintending Engineer, Bihar Rajya Pool Nigam, Saharsa Division

9. The Executive Engineer, Bihar Rajya Pool Nigam, Saharsa

10. The S. D. O. Bihar Rajya Pool Nigam, Saharsa

11. The Junior Engineer, Bihar Rajya Pool Nigam, Saharsa

12. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Supaul, District - Supual

13. Raj Construction , Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Respondent No.1 to 6 : Mr. Nutan Sahay, AC to GA-5 For the Respondent No.7 to 13: Mr. Md. Nadem Seraj ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2015 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. Therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous.

In above view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U