← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12585/2019disposed

Md. Mustafa @ Mustaque And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-03-06Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12585 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-741 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Md. Mustafa @ Mustaque, Son of Late Ali Mohammad 2.

Md. Akhtar @ Akhtar Alam, Son of Md. Mustafa 3.

Md. Mukhtar @ Mukhatar Alam, Son of Md. Mustafa 4.

Md. Ashique @ Asif Alam, Son of Md. Mustafa 5.

Bibi Jarina Khatoon, Wife of Md. Mustafa 6.

Bibi Tabbasum Khatoon, Wife of Md. Akhtar 7.

Bibi Guriya Khatoon @ Bibi Gudiya Khatoon D/o- Md. Akhtar All are Residents of Village - Bhoraha, P.S.- Raniganj, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bibi Rashida Khatoon Wife of Bilat Miyan Resident of Village - Bhadaha, P.S.- Raniganj, District - Araria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 741 C of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 380, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dayan Act. Basically, the allegation has been made about the branding the complainant as Dayan, assaulted her and whereafter the petitioner no.5 Bibi Jarina Khatoon tried to force to administer sloppy thing.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12585 of 2019(2) dt.06-03-2019 2/2 Looking to the nature of allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner no.5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioner no.5 surrenders before the Court below within six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the Court below will consider the same and pass appropriate order, considering the delay in lodging the complaint case, on the same day without being influenced by the order of this Court.

As there is no direct allegation against the petitioner nos. 1 to 4 and 6 to 7, let they be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Araria in connection with Complaint Case No.741 C of 2018 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T