Gorakh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14825 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar * ====================================================== GORAKH SINGH, Son of Laxman Prasad @ Laxman Prasad Singh, Resident of Collectorat Raod, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar (Town), District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 11-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Mahila (Buxar) P.S. Case No. 85 of 2018 for the offenses under Sections 341, 506, 500, 509, 292, 293, 294 of the Indian Penal Code and 67 (A) IT Act, 2008.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the similar allegation Mahila (Buxar) P.S. Case No. 7/2018 was registered against the petitioner in which he is on bail. Referring to the prosecution case, learned counsel submits that the informant is holding the post of Receptionist and the petitioner is staff working at Ujjwala Mahila Vikas Kendra and on account of the fact that both the petitioner and informant are working in the said Center intimacy developed and it is alleged that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14825 of 2019(2) dt.11-03-2019 2/2 mischievously the petitioner has taken data without the permission of the informant and thereafter he started blackmailing the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 6.1.2019 and the second FIR on the same set of facts is an abuse and unsustainable in law.
Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 6.1.2019 and for similar allegation in another case, the petitioner has been granted bail, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Mahila (Buxar) P.S. Case No. 85 of 2018. However, in the peculiar facts of the case, it is directed that both the bailors of the petitioner should be ladies of the same locality.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U T