Md. Firoz v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3100 of 2023 ====================================================== Md. Firoz Son of Md. Mahamdin, Resident of Village- Khairwa, P.S.- Punaura, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, District- Patna. 2.

The Director, Jan Siksha, Bihar, Patna, District- Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. 4.

The District Education Officer, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy 1 ( Sc 13 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-01-2024

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

2. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent/authority to add/absorb the petitioner under "Akshar Anchal Yojana", who has doing work as Tola Sevak of Talimi Markaz.

3. The Talimi Markaz is appointed under the scheme on contract basis for one year, as was done in the case of Tola Sewak and the post of Talimi Markaz Shikshak Swayam Sevi is not statutory and no recruitment rules are followed for their appointment.

4. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in the matter of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3100 of 2023(2) dt.04-01-2024 2/3 Tola Sewak, in CWJC No. 18107 of 2016, has held as follows: "The learned counsel for the respondents has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the present writ petition and has referred to a judgment dated 17.08.2015 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWJC No. 12390 of 2015 as well as to a judgment dated 02.02.2017 rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in L.P.Α. No.

2185 of 2015 whereby and whereunder it has been held that since the selection or engagement or hiring of the Tola Sevak is not a permanent appointment under the State, which is required to be considered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as well as since the post of Tola Sevak is under a scheme, the same does not create any statutory right in favour of the petitioner, hence writ petitions in such matters as that of Tola Sevaks are not maintainable. Having regard to the aforesaid judgments rendered by a coordinate Bench of this Court as also by the learned Division Bench of this Court, this Court is of the opinion that the present writ petition is not maintainable, hence the same is dismissed."

5. The order passed by the co-ordinate Bench presided over by Hon'ble Single Judge in the aforesaid writ application has been affirmed by a Division Bench of this Court, holding

Patna High Court CWJC No.3100 of 2023(2) dt.04-01-2024 3/3 that the writ petition is not maintainable.

6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid judgment of this Court and the fact that Talimi Markaz Shikshak Swayam Sevi does not hold civil post as well as the same is not a statutory post, I also come to the conclusion that the writ application is not maintainable.

7. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U