← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8135/2016withdrawn

Kaushalaya Devi And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2023-09-14Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8135 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-432 Year-2014 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Kaushalaya Devi daughter of late Jangi Sah Resident of Village -Kharpokhara, Police Station Bagaha, District West Champaran. 2.

Subodh@Subodh Yadav@Sipahi@Sipahi Yadav Son of Suresh Yadav Resident of Village -Pakargaon Po Kharpokhara, Police Station Bagaha District West Champaran.

3.

Om Prakash Dharikar son of Sheshnath Dharikar Resident of Village -Pathkhauli, Police station Bagaha District west Champaran .at Present resident of Village- dhadh wariyarwa, Police Station Semra, District West Champaran.

4.

Subhash yadav Son of late Mahadeo Yadav Resident of village Barwa, Police Station Bagaha, District West Champaran. 5.

Sheshnath yadav Son of Shambhu Yadav Resident of Village-Pakargaon Po. kharpokhara, Police Station - Bagaha District West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Rabindran Kishore Singh Son of Late Gorakh Singh Resident of VillageBanchachari Police Station Bagaha District West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing vehemently for sometimes, seeks permission to withdraw the present quashing application with liberty to raise all the issues at the time of framing of charge, if charge till date has not been framed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8135 of 2016(2) dt.14-09-2023 2/2

3. Permission is accorded with the liberty aforesaid.

4. Accordingly, the present quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T