Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13482/2025bail rejected

Mritunjay Kumar Mishra @ Mithu Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-10Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13482 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2024 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Mritunjay Kumar Mishra @ Mithu Mishra Son of Subhankar Mishra Resident of Village - Chauki, P.S. - Sahebpur Kamal, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ansul, Sr. Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Meena, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-07-2025 Heard Mr. Ansul, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Meena Singh, learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently added Section 302 along with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he was indiscriminately firing from the terrace, which hit the neighbors, who succumbed to the injuries sustained.

4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is also submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13482 of 2025(4) dt.10-07-2025 2/2 that even as per the allegation it is alleged that it was an indiscriminate firing, which hit the neighbor's wife, which was thus unintended and was accidental. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents and is in custody since 27.06.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the fact that there is specific allegation upon the petitioner of firing, this Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, the present bail application of the petitioner stands rejected.

8. It is expected that the learned trial court should expedite the trial.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T