Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12747/2025bail granted

Mannu Yadav @ Abhimanu Yadav @ Abhimanyu Yadav @ Manu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-15Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12747 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2019 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Mannu Yadav @ Abhimanu Yadav @ Abhimanyu Yadav @ Manu Yadav Son of Saral Yadav Resident of Village- Bangra, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District - Siwan, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Raghunathpur P.S. case No. 148 of 2019 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 682.560 liters liquor was recovered from two motorcycles parked outside the house of the petitioner and house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12747 of 2025(2) dt.15-04-2025 2/2 further submitted that recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioner where other family members also reside. Further the motorcycles in question do not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. case No. 148 of 2019.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T