Satrudhan Nat @ Satrohan Nat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17997 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-528 Year-2022 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Satrudhan Nat @ Satrohan Nat Son Of Late Vishwanath Nat Resident Of Village- Pakwa Nat Toli, Marhowrah, Ps- Marhowrah, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raushan Raj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Marhowrah P.S Case No. 528/2022 dated 14.08.2022 for the offences punishable u/s 30 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 20 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. No incriminating article has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17997 of 2024(2) dt.18-03-2024 2/3 the conscious possession of the petitioner, hence no case is made out. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. It is further submitted that the recovery is made from the house of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the materials available on record against the petitioner, I am of the view that no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. The petition is disposed of and the petitioner is directed to surrender to the Court below within six weeks from the date of this order and the Court below shall consider the prayer of the bail of the petitioner on the same day

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17997 of 2024(2) dt.18-03-2024 3/3 without being prejudice by this order.

7. This application stands disposed of.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T