Lal Saheb Mahto @ Lal Saheb Matho And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14678 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2018 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
LAL SAHEB MAHTO @ LAL SAHEB MATHO Son of Suresh Mahto Resident of Village - Gamharia, Khurd, P.S.-Adapur, District - East Champaran 2.
Muna Mahto Son of Suresh Mahto Resident of Village - Gamharia, Khurd, P.S.- Adapur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147/341/323/354/427/436/504/448/34 IPC registered in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 191/2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. In any event, the accusations are general and omnibus in nature. There is no injury report to corroborate the accusation of assault on the informant's wife. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Raxaul, District East Champaran, in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 191/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14678 of 2019(2) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:
i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T