← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3064/2026disposed

Ram Bhagat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-15Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3064 of 2026 ====================================================== Ram Bhagat Yadav Son of Late Chhathu Yadav @ Chhatu Yadav, Resident of Village- Pohadhi Bela Tole, Maswasi, P.S. Ghanshyampur, DistrictDarbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Collector, Darbhanga.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biraul, Darbhanga. 4.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Biraul, Darbhanga. 5.

The Circle Officer, Ghanshyampur, Darbhanga.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel (21) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-04-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for issuance of a direction/ order or an appropriate writ/ writs directing the respondent authorities specially respondent no.5 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 09.06.2025 of the petitioner with regard to fresh measurement of land of the petitioner in Mauza Pohadi Bela, Tola Muswasi, Khata No. 6520, area 58 decimal in which the earlier measurement of the land of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3064 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 2/2 petitioner was vague and in this regard the Anchal Amin submitted the measurement report which was vague report."

3. A counter-affidavit has come on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 to 5 and the learned State counsel has taken this Court to the two Annexures (Annexure-R/A and R/B) to show that a proper measurement of the petitioner's land has been done as per the report submitted by the Anchal Amin, Ghanshyampur, Darbhanga dated 17.03.2026.

4. This Court is convinced that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. If he still has any issue, can very well move before an appropriate Revenue Authority.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U