Sarvesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15191 of 2016 ====================================================== Sarvesh Prasad, son of Sri Dev Sharan Yadav, Resident of Village-Sone Sah, Police Station- Nimchak Bathani, District-Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna

4. The Joint Additional Secretary Vigilance Department

5. The Dy. Superintendent of Police (Vigilance), Patna Zone, Sri Ambrish Kumar Singh

6. The Inspector No. (1) Sri Akhaya Kumar Mishra (2) Sri Bijendra Narayan Singh, Both are Police Inspector, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna Zone, P.S.-Shastri Nagar, District-Patna

7. The I.O.-Cum Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance (Vigilance), Patna

8. The Public Information Officer, General Administration Department Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Verma, AAG-3 Ms. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-09-2016 Heard Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. P.K. Verma, learned AAG3, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Having regard to the fact that with regard to the alleged misappropriation of fund, Department of Vigilance, Government of Bihar has already registered Vigilance Case

Patna High Court CWJC No.15191 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016 2/2 No.55 of 2015, we are clearly of the view that no further direction by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is called for.

In view of the above, this writ petition is closed with the liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised. (I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U