Renu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3916 of 2014 ====================================================== Renu Kumari, daughter of Satyadev Sah, wife of Indrdeo Sah, resident of Village- Kahatarwa, P.S- Sheohar, District- Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Sheohar.
5. The District Education Officer-Cum- District Programme Officer, Sheohar.
6. The Sub- Divisional Education Officer, Sheohar.
7. The Block Development Officer, Block-Tariyani, District- Sheohar.
8. The Block Education Officer, Block-Tariyani, District- Sheohar.
9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Belahiya, Block-Tariyani, DistrictSheohar.
10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Belahiya, BlockTariyani, District- Sheohar.
11. Anamika Anjan, daughter of Ramakant Pandey, resident of Chapra Dhal, Punarwas, P.S- Tariyani, District- Sheohar.
12. Rupali Singh, W/O Rajesh Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Tariyani Chapra, P.S.- Tariyani, District- Sheohar.
13. Chitralekha Kumari, daughter of Ram Chandra Prasad Singh, resident of Village and Post- Sarbarpur, P.S- Tariyani, District- Sheohar.
14. The Member, District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Sheohar.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Kaushal Kr.Jha, A.A.G. 14. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-11-2017 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed by the respondents. No further substantive relief is required to be granted to the petitioner.
Considering the submission made on behalf of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3916 of 2014 (5) dt.22-11-2017 2/2 petitioner, the present writ application has been become infructuous.
Hence, the present writ application is dismissed as being infructuous.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U