Om Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20515 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2015 Thana -GHANSHYAMPUR District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Om Prakash Yadav Son of Suraya Narayan Yadav@ Suraj Narayan Yadav Resident of Village- Navtol , P.S. Phulparas, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 11.06.2015 and, earlier, his prayer for bail was rejected by this Court giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail, if his trial is not concluded within six months. However, the impugned order goes to show that the informant as well as the investigating officer have not been examined as yet.

No doubt, petitioner carries criminal antecedent of 13 cases but having more or less, similar allegation, several coaccused have already been granted privilege of bail by different benches of this Court.

Accordingly, let the petitioner be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20515 of 2017 (2) dt.28-06-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Session Judge, Benipur, Darbhanga in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No. 69 of 2015.subject to condition that one of the sureties must be a close relative of the petitioner and he/ she shall swear an affidavit to this effect as to how he / she is related to the petitioner and furthermore petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date in person for the period of six months or till conclusion of his trial whichever is earlier, and if he fails to do so, on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T