Mukesh Kumar @ Mirdul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23024 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2016 Thana -HARPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR @ MIRDUL, son of Ashok Singh, resident of VillageMahpur, P.S.- Tarapur, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Harpur P.S.Case No. 39 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and he has not been put on T.I. Parade and he is in custody for about four months. So far criminal antecedents are concerned, it has been submitted that petitioner is on bail in those cases.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that petitioner has criminal antecedents also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23024 of 2017 (2) dt.15-05-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Munger, in connection with Harpur P.S.Case No. 39 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U