Patna High CourtCWJC/2298/2014withdrawn

Tribhuwan Arora J.V. And ANR v. The State Bank Of India And ORS

2015-07-06Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2298 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Tribhuwan Arora (J.V.) having its registered office at 93 Saraswati Appartment, S.P.Verma Road, District- Patna, Bihar through its Partner Mr. Rakesh Singh, Son of Late Kunwar Ranbir Singh, resident of Kunwar House, Plot No. 3y, Block C, Road No. 11, Rajendra Nagar, Patna, Bihar

2. Mr. Rakesh Singh Son of Late Kunwar Ranbir Singh, resident of Kunwar House, Plot No. 3y, Block C, Road No. 11, Rajendra Nagar, Patna, Bihar .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Bank Of India Through Its Chairman Having Its Registered Office At Corporate Centre, State Bank Bhawan, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra

2. The Zonal Manager, State Bank Of India, Patna Zone, Gandhi Maidan, Patna, Bihar

3. The Branch Manager, S.M.E. Branch, State Bank Of India, Dak Banglow Road, Patna

4. Tribhuwan Narayan Singh Son Of Ramdeo Singh Resident Of Chandra Shekhar Rauza, Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent No.4: M/s. Chittaranjan Sinha, Senior Advocate and Anjani Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 06-07-2015 Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files second supplementary affidavit stating in paragraph-2 that he wants to withdraw this writ application as the grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed in terms of some settlement reached outside the court.

Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2298 of 2014 (4) dt.06-07-2015 2/2 During passing of the present order, the petitioner no.2 and respondent no.4 both are personally present and they do not have any objection.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) N.H./- U