Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20668/2017dismissed

Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20668 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -67 Year- 2016 Thana -PHULPARAS District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Yadav, Son of Sri Rameshwar Yadav, resident of Village- Jatahi, P.S.- Khutauna, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Phulpras P.S.Case No.67 of 2016 for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name transpired during the course of investigation of the case. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner as well as nothing has been recovered from him and he has not been put on T.I.P.

It is further submitted that so far criminal antecedent of the petitioner is concerned, he is on bail in all those cases. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20668 of 2017 (2) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 bail, stating that the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement and apart from that he is in custody in similar type of other cases.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of seven months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U