← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21573/2021bail granted

Krishna Gupta @ Krishna Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2021-04-13Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21573 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2020 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== KRISHNA GUPTA @ KRISHNA KUMAR GUPTA, aged about 49 years (Male), S/o Late Vishnu Saw @ Vishun Saw, R/o village- Dharmshala, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya.

.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-04-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through Virtual mode.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 379, 504/34 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the petitioner and others armed with Lathi and Iron rod assaulted the informant, due to that, he sustained head injury. It is also alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21573 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2021 2/3 that one of the accused persons also made firing to create terror and snatched a gold chain.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against him. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place between the parties. Subsequently, the matter has been compromised between the parties and in respect of that a joint compromise petition on behalf of the informant and the petitioner and others has been filed in the learned court below. The said joint compromise petition is Annexure-3 to the present bail application.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Gaya, in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21573 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2021 3/3 140 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T