Ram Lakhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12699 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ram Lakhan Yadav S/o Late Gauri yadav R/o Village- Ajam Nagar, Phoolwali, Gali Ward No 05, Ps- L.N.M.U, Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Baidyanath Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 109, 124(1) and 352 of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has thrown acid on the face of the son of the informant due to which, he has received burn injuries and has also got blind.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it is clear that police has filed charge sheet without injury report. He has also submitted injury report issued by Darbhanga Medical Collge/Hospital, Laheriasarai

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12699 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 according to which, the injured has received thermal injuries. He has further submitted that there is allegation of sprinkling acid whereas the injuries are of thermal nature which does not correlate. Learned counsel has further submitted due to intervention of the well-wishers, the parties have compromised the case. It is a dispute only regarding the retiremental benefit of the petitioner which has now been settled. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.04.2025 having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Darbhanga. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T