Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14237/2018bail granted

Umesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2018-04-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14237 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -BARURAJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Umesh Mahto S/o Rajdeo Mahto, R/o Village- Birahima Bazar, P.S.- Barauraj, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2018 Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 26.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27657 of 2017 with observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of one year.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in spite of diction of this court uptil now trial has not been concluded and only one witness has been examined and there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future and he has been in judicial custody since 16.03.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the period of custody, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14237 of 2018 (3) dt.04-04-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge - Muzaffarpur, in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T