Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16143/2024bail rejected

Ravi Rouniyar @ Ravi Kumar @ Amrendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16143 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2021 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ravi Rouniyar @ Ravi Kumar @ Amrendra Kumar S/o Sitaram Sah R/o Vill - Bhavdepur Got (Bhabdepur), P.S. - Riga, Dist. - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ritesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner had moved earlier seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.788 of 2023 and the same was rejected by an order dated 29.04.2023 on the ground that petitioner has antecedent of ten cases, but then liberty was granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

3. The learned counsel submits that petitioner in terms of the liberty has approached this Court. It is next submitted that charges against the petitioner was framed by an order dated 11.07.2022, but then the said fact could not be brought to the notice of the Court in Cr. Misc. No.788 of 2023 when the same was taken up on 29.04.2023.

4. The learned APP submits that since charges have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16143 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 been framed on 11.07.2022, as such the trial has commenced and since the trial has commenced and that too about more than an year and a half back the learned Trial court should be directed to expedite the trial instead of granting bail as petitioner has antecedent of ten cases.

5. Considering the submission made by the learned APP the Court is not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, accordingly, the bail application is rejected.

6. However, the learned trial court shall try to expedite the trial.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T