Akhilesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12860 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2021 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== AKHILESH YADAV, S/o Deoki Yadav, R/o village- Parsawan Khurd, Tola Mishirichak, P.S.- Raushanganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Raushanganj P.S. Case No. 196 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

The recovery of liquor is from the house of the petitioner.

Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.), this application

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12860 of 2022(2) dt.01-04-2022 2/2 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable. Accordingly, it is dismissed as not maintainable. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T