← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17170/2023allowed

Sattan Ram @ Satyanarayan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-29Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17170 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2022 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Sattan Ram @ Satyanarayan Ram Son Of Late Thegu Ram R/O VillageJamorhi, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas 2.

Baliram @ Bali Ram Son Of Sattan Ram @ Satyanarayan Ram R/O VillageJamorhi, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashish For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with other co-accused being the in-laws, committed murder of the informant'sdaughter, namely, Rubi Kumari.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17170 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/3 petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have committed no offence. Being the father-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased, they have falsely been implicated in the present case. They have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband. There is no specific overt act of allegation against the petitioners. It is further submitted that husband of the deceased, namely, Sugrim Ram is already in judicial custody. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody about ten months. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17170 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 3/3 on bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 225 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned XIX Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas, Sasaram.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U T