Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15113/2017bail granted

Pramod Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-26Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15113 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15113 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -105 Year- 2017 Thana -GANDHIMAIDAN District- PATNA ====================================================== Pramod Ranjan, Son of Late Dinesh Kumar Verma, Resident of VillageHansa Dih, Police Station- Masrakh, District- Saran at Chapra at present Renter in the House of Amar Singh, Resident of Mohalla- North Mandiri Bapu Nagar, Police Station- Budha Colony, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 105 of 2017 registered under Sections 419, 420, 384 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but in course of investigation, the petitioner was apprehended in the campus of BISCOMAUN by the police, who got recorded the confessional statement of the petitioner to the effect that this petitioner used to do the work as Broker in the D.T.O. office. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 21.02.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15113 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Maidan P.S. Case No. 105 of 2017. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T