← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/823/2022dismissed

Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Shalendra Kumar Yadav @ Shalesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-29Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.823 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2020 Thana- SINGHIYA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

ROHIT KUMAR YADAV @ SHALENDRA KUMAR YADAV @ SHALESH KUMAR YADAV Son of Ravindra Yadav Resident of VillageAgraul, P.S.- Singhia, District- Samastipur. 2.

Ravindra Yadav Son of Late Satnarayan Yadv Resident of Village- Agraul, P.S.- Singhia, District- Samastipur.

3.

Alok Yadav @ Aalok Kumar Yadav Son of Sivan Yadav Resident of VillageAgraul, P.S.- Singhia, District- Samastipur. 4.

Shivan Yadav @ Shiv Narayan Yadav @ Sivan Yadav Son of Late Bauku Yadav @ Late Baukoo Resident of Village- Agraul, P.S.- Singhia, DistrictSamastipur. 5.

Krishchandra Yadav @ Krishan Chandra Yadav Son of Late Satnarayan Yadav Resident of Village- Agraul, P.S.- Singhia, District- Samastipur. 6.

Neelam Devi @ Nilam Devi Wife of Amrendra Yadav Resident of VillageAgraul, P.S.- Singhia, District- Samastipur. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Jitan Ram Son of Late Sukho Ram Resident of Village- Agraul, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Singhia, District- Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Usha Kumari 1 Mr.Pankaj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, State and respondent no. 2.

It is submitted on behalf of the respondent no. 2 that this appeal is not maintainable as cognizance has already been taken against appellants by the Court below also for the offences punishable under the SC/ST Act.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.823 of 2022(3) dt.29-03-2023 2/2 In view of the fact that cognizance has already been taken against the appellants, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T